Search across your corpus, document extraction, file automation. AI prepares, the professional drafts and takes responsibility.
Years of intellectual output that cannot be put to use, legal privilege that rules out consumer tools, non-billable hours piling up, and practice management software that keeps the door closed.
Archived files, pleadings, deeds, templates, internal know-how: years of intellectual output stored but never put to use. Finding the relevant precedent depends on the memory of whoever wrote it.
Uploading a case document to a consumer assistant hosted outside the European Union is not an option. The constraint is not technical, it is professional ethics, and it rules out most tools on the market from the start.
Document research, file assembly, exhibit lists, completeness checks: qualified time spent on manual handling, rarely billable to the client.
Practice management tools handle billing and the calendar, but make no use of the firm's document capital. The most valuable data in the firm is the data the software does not give access to.
A document set to make searchable, exhibits to review, files to assemble, or a tracking tool to build around your practice management software.
Deed templates, pleadings, notes, internal know-how: searchable in plain language, with systematic citation of the document and passage used. Never an invented answer. When the source is missing, the tool says so.
AI assistants connected to your dataData rooms, exhibit lists, large volumes of opposing party documents: structured extraction using OCR and Mistral, with human review. The professional keeps control of the qualification, the tool removes the manual review workload.
Mistral AgencyClient intake, completeness checks, document follow-ups, deadline tracking. For notary offices, the same mechanism equips the preparation of AML obligations. The filing itself remains the act of the public officer.
KYC & AML automationFile tracking, deadline dashboards, an audit trail for access to sensitive documents: a tool built around the firm's actual organization, alongside the existing practice management software.
Business applicationWho drafts, who signs, where do the documents live, what happens to the indexed corpus if we part ways? These are the questions that determine any AI project under legal privilege, addressed before the first line of code.
AI researches, summarizes, and prepares templates. It produces no binding deed and replaces no signature. A deed, pleadings, or a legal opinion always go through the drafting and responsibility of the professional.
Every result points to the document and the passage it comes from, verifiable in one click. If the corpus does not contain the answer, the tool says so. This is an architecture requirement, not a setting.
Models are used for inference only. No document, no deed, no note is used to train or fine-tune a model, whether with us or with a third party. The commitment is contractual.
When the sensitivity level requires it, everything (the document set, the vector index, the model) runs on a machine you own. No data leaves the firm, which considerably simplifies the ethics review.
Who accessed which document, when, and through which query: the log is exportable. On segregated files or in a potential conflict-of-interest situation, this is what demonstrates that the separation holds.
We are technical implementers. Your professional ethics, your internal procedures, and your own judgment are the only reference. The tool conforms to them and issues no legal opinion.
We do not display any client law firm. What we show: two mechanisms already in production, document extraction and sensitive data processing.
Automatic qualification and extraction of incoming documents through a self-hosted n8n workflow paired with Mistral, with human review before integration: -90% manual re-entry. The technical building block is the same as reviewing a data room.
Read the case studyRow-level security segregation across every table, and a critical system switch with zero service interruption. A firm's requirements on segregated files are the same in nature: filtered access, traceability, continuity.
Read the case studyLaw firm, notary office, or legal department: we start with a narrow document set (one practice area, one type of deed, one set of pleadings) and measure the research time saved before expanding. The document set stays with you for the entire pilot.
Proven, recruit-friendly technologies, self-hosting available on the firm's premises, and integration with existing practice management tools rather than a replacement.
The questions that come up during scoping with a law firm partner, a notary, or the legal director of a mid-sized company.