E-invoicing and accounting workflows:automate preparation, retain validation.
From email to prepared entries: document extraction, pre-allocation per your rules, integration with your production tools — and cabinet review before any posting.
The reform is here. The workflows, however, have not.
A regulatory deadline to meet, rekeying that consumes production, a poorly connected tool ecosystem, and fee pressure: four constraints piling up on the same teams.
The reform requires overhauling workflows now
Mandatory reception for all businesses from September 2026, widespread issuance by September 2027. This is not a file format issue: it’s the entire document intake chain that is changing.
Rekeying consumes production
Supplier invoices, expense reports, bank statements: hours of low-value data entry for documents arriving as PDFs, via email, in a DMS, or on a portal. Qualified staff spend time here that they do not spend on review.
A poorly connected ecosystem
Production tool, client ERP, DMS, supplier portals: each exposes data differently, if at all. When two tools don’t communicate, a human bridges the gap — at the keyboard.
Fee pressure, recruitment challenges
Fee rates no longer keep pace with the time spent, and qualified profiles are hard to recruit. Automating document handling is no longer a comfort project—it’s a necessity to keep your team focused on high-value tasks.
02 — What we automate
Four projects that free up production hours.
From incoming documents to the CFO’s dashboard, each intervention leverages your existing rules—without ever altering the accounting process, which remains yours.
AI in accounting requires a framework. Here’s ours.
Who validates the entry, where do client files go, what remains of the configuration if we part ways? The answers that determine the automation of an accounting chain — asked before the first line of code.
Entries are prepared, never integrated without review
AI proposes a pre-assigned entry with matched supporting documents. No accounting integration occurs without validation by an authorized team member — and this validation is logged.
No accounting or tax advice
We are technical implementers. Accounting processing, tax analysis, and liability remain the responsibility of the accountant. The tool applies your rules; it does not create any.
Logging aligned with reliable audit trails
Every incoming document, extraction, modification, and validation is timestamped and retained. The path from invoice to entry is traceable and exportable — exactly what an audit requires.
Sovereign AI
Mistral by default, open models self-hosted when case sensitivity demands it. No accounting document is sent to an API outside the European Union.
Confidential client files
Partitioning by file and by collaborator at the database level, hosting in France, on-premises deployment possible. The firm’s professional secrecy is an architectural constraint, not a contractual clause.
Guaranteed reversibility
Code delivered, assignment rules documented, data exportable. If you switch production tools or providers, the configuration remains yours and can be reconnected elsewhere.
04 — Proof
The incoming invoice process, already in production.
One case where the mechanism is nearly identical to a supplier flow, and another demonstrating automated workflows at scale.
Accounting firm or financial director of an ETI: we focus on a single flow—such as supplier invoices for a portfolio of files—and measure the time saved on data entry before scaling. The numbers determine the next steps.
The questions that come up during scoping with a firm partner, a production manager, or the financial director of an SME.
No, and we have no intention of becoming one. Your dematerialisation platform remains the one you’ve chosen. We connect your tools to this platform and automate everything around it: retrieving flows, extraction, pre-allocation, reconciliation, feeding your production tool, and tracking dashboards.
Entries are prepared automatically, never integrated automatically. The AI extracts the document, suggests an allocation based on your rules, and reconciles references. An authorised team member validates—or corrects—and it’s this validation that triggers integration. Corrections feed the rules for next time.
In the vast majority of cases, yes: via API when your provider exposes one, via structured file imports otherwise, or via EDI on the client’s ERP side. We address this question in the first workshop, as it determines the scope that can actually be automated.
Each document is preserved in its original state, each process is timestamped and attributed, and each proposed entry is linked to the document it comes from and the agent who validated it. Everything is exportable. The path from invoice to entry is therefore fully traceable—exactly what an audit requires.
Yes: hosting in France, access partitioning by file and by team member at the database level, self-hosting possible on your premises. No document passes through an API outside the European Union, and your files are never used to train a model.
Four to six weeks for a pilot on a defined flow—typically supplier invoices for a portfolio of files. We deploy on this scope and measure the time saved per entry. Expansion is decided based on this figure.
Yes. The code, documentation, and configured allocation rules are delivered to you. Exports are in open formats, and hosting is transferable: switching providers won’t mean starting from scratch.
Let’s discuss
The reform is coming and your flows aren’t ready? Let’s talk scope, integrations, and time saved.