Framer vs Webflow: which tool should you choose for your projects?

You see Framer and Webflow everywhere and you really wonder which one to choose for your web projects. You need clean, efficient sites that bring you back business, not a new designer toy. We are going to clarify all this, calmly, and with a slight bias for Webflow, because for the majority of companies, it is the most solid tool.

Framer vs Webflow at a glance

If you want a quick summary: Framer is a very design-oriented and animation-oriented tool, Webflow is a complete platform for creating websites, with a real CMS, solid SEO features and integrated online publishing.

To give you a clear view, here is a summary comparison of the two tools for your projects on the internet.

Overall, for a business site on the internet with a real content plan, a structured CMS and SEO, Webflow takes the advantage. Framer remains an excellent solution for creative projects and advanced animations.

When is Webflow the best choice?

For most SMEs, Webflow is the most logical option

If you run an SME, a VSE or a B2B project, you need a tool that allows you to create solid websites that are easy to manage, and that can evolve. Webflow checks these boxes.

You benefit from a complete CMS for content management, a visual interface for design, SEO features designed for businesses and a simple online layout. Your teams can manage the site on a daily basis without touching the code, while still being able to add custom development if necessary.

Webflow is ideal for you if you want a site that brings together design, content, interactions, SEO and hosting in the same place, without multiplying tools.

When Framer can better fit your project

Framer can be a great choice for certain types of projects. For example, if you have a team of designers who are very comfortable with Figma and the top priority is interface design and very advanced animations.

If you're working on a landing page, a highly interactive product experience, or a site that's almost like a live demo, Framer is very pleasant to use. The platform puts interactions at the center of design, sometimes at the expense of content management or a long-term SEO plan.

In summary, Framer is attractive for designers and for a project focused on visual impact, Webflow is more suitable as soon as we talk about businesses, content and growth on the internet.

Framer vs Webflow: understanding the two tools before deciding

Webflow: a complete nocode platform for business sites

Webflow is a platform for creating no-code websites that combines design, front-end development, CMS and hosting in the same tool. You build your project via a visual interface, but the result is a clean, exportable code ready for SEO.

The CMS allows you to structure your content into collections: blog articles, customer cases, team members, service sheets, products, everything that makes up the life of a business site. Non-technical users can then manage the content directly, without breaking the site design.

For a company, the advantage is clear: you have a unique solution for design, publishing, content management and SEO optimization, with advanced functionalities for complex projects, while maintaining flexibility.

Framer: from prototyping tools to creating websites

Framer comes from the world of interface prototyping. Its DNA is very designer. We think in screens, in interactions, in animations, more than in content structure. The interface is a lot like what designers are already familiar with on Figma.

Today Framer also allows you to publish sites in production, with templates, a hosting offer and web-based nocode functionalities. But the priority remains visual design and advanced interactions.

For a designer who wants to quickly transform a prototype into an online site, Framer is very pleasant. For a company that has a content plan, a long-term CMS, and an SEO strategy, it shows its limits more quickly.

Design, animations and user experience

Framer vs Webflow for design

On the design side, both tools are very good, but not in the same way. Webflow offers an interface similar to code, with classes, structures, containers and very CSS logic. This is perfect for achieving a design that is accurate, clean, consistent and easy to evolve over time.

Framer, on the other hand, takes a freer approach. The designer finds his playground, a canvas, frames, a logic very similar to Figma. For designers already trained in these tools, learning is quick. For more marketing profiles, the interface often requires a bit more effort.

In practice, if your team is composed mostly of product and UI designers, Framer will be very natural. If you want a clear bridge between design, front-end development and SEO, Webflow gives better control.

Advanced animations and interactions

Framer has built his reputation on interactions. Micro animations, smooth transitions, small details that give this feeling of a very successful product, he is very comfortable. For projects where animation is at the heart of the experience, the tool is impressive.

Webflow also offers advanced interactions. You can manage scroll animations, appearance effects, hovers, sliders, tabs, complex interactions triggered by user behavior. For the majority of business sites, these capacities are more than sufficient. And if you need more, you can always add custom code.

In summary, Framer goes a step further in pure animation, Webflow offers an excellent balance between animations, performance, SEO and content.

CMS, content and SEO: where Webflow gets a real head start

CMS and content management on the Webflow side

For a corporate site, content management is central. You publish blog posts, case studies, news, service pages, sometimes in multiple languages. Webflow was designed for this type of project.

Its nocode CMS allows you to create custom types of content. You can then generate dozens or hundreds of dynamic pages from these collections, while maintaining the same design. Marketing users can manage content without touching design or development.

For complex projects with a real editorial plan, Webflow is an ideal solution. The CMS remains legible, structured, and very pleasant to manage for teams.

Content and limits on the Framer side

Framer now offers features to manage a bit of content, but that's clearly not its strong suit. The platform was not originally designed as a complete CMS. When you have to manage a lot of content or complex structures, you quickly run into limits.

For a simple landing page or a mini website, it doesn't matter. For a business site that has to live for several years, with a lot of pages, this lack of structure pays off quite quickly.

SEO, performance and online publishing

On SEO, Webflow has a real maturity. You easily manage title tags, meta descriptions, alt tags, own URLs, the sitemap, the robots.txt. The structure of the generated code makes it easier for search engines to work. You can build a real content strategy and let the site grow.

The online launch is integrated: hosting, SSL, CDN, everything is provided in the offer. You focus on the projects, not on the server configuration. For businesses, it is a very comfortable solution.

Framer also allows you to publish sites on the Internet, but the tool is less focused on SEO and long-term content. For a very image-oriented project or a short campaign, that's fine. For a strategic web project, Webflow keeps the advantage.

Nocode, code and development

How far to go with Webflow without writing code

Webflow is designed as a nocode tool, but it is not a toy. You can go far without writing a line of code, by managing complex sites, with animations, advanced interactions, CMS, and integrations with other tools.

When you need advanced development, you can inject custom code, connect APIs, use attributes, and integrate third-party solutions. This is where Webflow becomes a real front-end nocode development platform, with advanced capabilities for complex projects.

This flexibility allows companies to last a long time with the same solution, by making the site evolve as needed.

Development on the Framer side

Framer allows you to create sites without code, with a strong focus on design. For development, the tool is less suited to complex architectures or advanced business logic. You can of course tinker, but it's not designed as a base for a big CMS project or a site with a lot of dependencies.

Framer remains an excellent solution for a web project centered on one page or a few pages, with significant animations and a high design requirement.

Interface, learning and getting started

Webflow for marketing teams and non-technical users

At first, the Webflow interface can be impressive. We quickly see concepts similar to code, classes, containers, flexboxes. But after a short learning phase, users understand the logic and gain autonomy.

A motivated marketing team, accompanied by proper training, can take control of the content, some visuals, the updating of pages, or even the creation of new sections. This is a real advantage for businesses that don't want to depend on the developer for every micro change.

Webflow University and the community offer a lot of resources to accelerate this skills development.

Framer for designers who come from Figma

If you are a designer and you already live in Figma, Framer will seem very familiar to you. The canvas, the logic of frames, the way of placing the elements, everything is designed for you. Learning the tool is quick, especially if you have a product culture.

For teams of designers who want to maintain direct control of the site, this is a real possibility. The downside is that marketing profiles or non-designer managers may be a bit more lost in this interface, which is less content-oriented.

Templates, community, and ecosystem

The Webflow ecosystem at the service of businesses

Webflow has a huge community of designers, developers, integrators, agencies. You will find templates for all types of projects: SaaS, consulting firms, industrial SMEs, light e-commerce, training, events.

This ecosystem is valuable if you want to start from an existing template to speed up design, or if you are looking for an agency to support you with development, redesign or web strategy. There are also lots of reusable components, training resources, and a very active community.

Community and templates on the Framer side

Framer also has a great community, but more focused on designers and product startups. The available templates are often very modern, designed for SaaS landing pages or sites oriented to product storytelling.

If your web project is very linked to a digital product, it's interesting. But if you are looking for a larger plan for your SME site, with content, SEO and a well-thought-out CMS, the Webflow ecosystem is still more suitable.

Prices, offers and overall cost

Understanding Webflow offers

Webflow generally works with one offer per site, to which you add a CMS plan or a more advanced plan depending on the project. The overall cost depends on the type of site, traffic volume, number of team members, and development complexity.

For a business, you have to look at the total cost: design, initial development, integrations, then maintenance. The advantage is that you centralize everything on a single platform, with a single interface and a single host.

In practice, Webflow quickly becomes profitable if you use it as a base for several years, with a content strategy and a real vision on your projects.

Offer logic on the Framer side

Framer also offers plans per site or workspace, with a different price logic but quite similar in principle: you pay for the tool and the hosting.

This can be interesting for a simple project, a product page, or a specific campaign. For a large corporate site with a lot of content, several users and a rich CMS, the flexibility of Webflow remains more convincing in the long term.

Why I recommend Webflow to the majority of businesses

The advantages of Webflow for your projects

If I have to summarize, Webflow is a very solid solution for businesses that want to seriously invest in their websites. You have a platform that combines design, development, CMS, SEO and hosting.

You can design complex sites, organize your content in a suitable CMS, manage animations without sacrificing performance, and make your project evolve over time. Your internal users keep control of the content updated.

The nocode capabilities allow you to move quickly, while still being able to add code for advanced needs. The template ecosystem, community, and training resources secure your choice over several years.

Framer's specific strengths

Framer, on the other hand, is still a very good tool if your need revolves around pure design, interface and interactions. For designers coming from Figma, learning is fast.

You can create very advanced animations and very smooth experiences. For product sites, demonstrations, very creative campaigns, the tool does the job, and even more.

I don't place it as the main solution for a large business site, but it has its place in a design stack for certain types of projects.

Do you want to move from comparison to a real solid Webflow project?

If you recognize yourself in the SME, TPE or company profile that wants a clear, well-designed website, with a clean CMS, solid SEO features and opportunities for evolution, Webflow is probably the best solution for you.

At Scroll, we support just this type of project: choice of the platform, design, Webflow development, implementation of the CMS, animations, integrations, then training your teams for content management. You remain the owner of your tool, with an Internet-ready site, designed to last and to support your business.

If you want us to look at your project together and to help you make a concrete decision between Framer and Webflow, you can brief us and we will take the time to offer you a clear plan, adapted to your goals and the reality of your resources.

‍