Best AI for coding: the most effective tools

Are you looking for the best AI for coding to save time without sacrificing quality. The right choice depends mainly on your context, of your IDE, of your languages and your constraints of security.

Fast response: the best AI to code according to your context

Before comparing models, start from the way you work. A tool can be great at code generation, but average at bug analysis. Another may shine in the IDE, but lack project context.

This table gives a quick choice. The real gain then comes from the implementation: context, code rules, tests, and a specific use in your project.
‍

What really saves time with AI in code

Most teams waste time evaluating AI on a demo. In production, good results come from three things: context, the integration into theIDE, and the discipline around tests.
‍

Context: the difference between “pretty code” and useful code

An AI can offer a clean, but false, solution for your project. The reason is simple: it does not see your internal rules, your architecture, your technical choices, or your documentation. The more context the tool manages, the more relevant its suggestions become.

Cursor, for example, focuses on understanding the codebase through indexing and retrieving context related to open files and the project.
Claude Code also explains that automatic context collection consumes resources (time, tokens) and that it must be optimized according to your environment.

What to remember for an SME: if you have a living product, with several developers and a GitHub history, choose a tool that “sees” the project, not just an isolated function.
‍

The IDE: the AI should be where the developer codes

An AI assistant that requires you to change tabs quickly loses its value. The best tools are the ones that integrate with VS Code or JetBrains because they act at the exact moment you code: suggestions, completion, correction, test generation, documentation.

Copilot offers features in the editor, and GitHub describes Copilot Chat as available on the web and in IDEs like VS Code and JetBrains.
Gemini Code Assist is also present via IDE plugins (VS Code, JetBrains) and is integrated into Cloud Code.
‍

The tests: this is where AI really pays

If you only use AI to generate code, you'll save a bit of time. If you use it to generate tests, detect errors, and speed up validation, you gain a lot more.

In practice, AI is very effective for:

• propose a first version of unit tests
• cover borderline cases
• suggest assertions consistent with expected behavior
• Explain mistakes and then suggest solutions

But you need a simple rule: all generated code must go through a “tests + review” loop. Without it, you are moving the burden from development to the burden of correction.
‍

Security: essential as soon as there is sensitive code

As soon as you put client code, secrets, or strong business logic into an assistant, the question becomes “where does the data go.” Some platforms put forward very specific promises.

Tabnine, for example, discusses encryption, zero data retention, and deployment options, and specifies in its documentation that its models are not trained on your code.
For an SME, it is often the point that contrasts between a consumer tool and a more comprehensive solution.
‍

Useful comparison: Copilot, Cursor, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Tannine

Here, the aim is not to rank “the best” in general. It is to understand which tool is the most effective according to your development tasks, your languages, and your way of working.
‍

GitHub Copilot: effective when your coding lives in the IDE and GitHub

Copilot is often chosen because it fits into the daily life of developers: code suggestions, chat, and more and more “agent” options. GitHub highlights an agent mode in the IDE, and a “coding agent” on the GitHub side capable of working on assigned tasks and creating pull requests.

When Copilot saves time:
You are writing an API route, a web page, a mapping, a validation, or a simple migration. Suggestions come quickly. You stay in the IDE. You keep up the pace.

When to frame it:
On a project with a lot of internal conventions, Copilot can propose “standard” code that does not follow your patterns. In this case, the solution is not to throw it away, but to give it style rules, examples, and to link it to your context.

Good SME fit:
Team that already works with GitHub, that wants to boost productivity without changing tools.
‍

Cursor: a good choice when the project context is your weak point

Cursor is an AI-oriented editor, built around a simple idea: the better the AI understands your codebase, the more useful changes it offers. Cursor explains its “codebase understanding” logic and the possibility of accessing several models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, etc.).
In its documentation, Cursor also details context management based on the status of the code and relevant files.

When Cursor becomes very effective:
You are requesting a change that affects several files. You want to understand where a color is defined, where a business rule is applied, or why a bug is occurring. The tool will search the database, gather the context, then propose.

To watch out for:
Like any tool that “acts” on several files, you need a framework: small steps, tests, and validation by review. Otherwise, you save time at the beginning and you lose it correcting.

Good SME fit:
A product that grows, a non-trivial code base, and the need for an assistant that understands the project, not just a function.
‍

ChatGPT (OpenAI): the Swiss Army knife for plan, generation and explanation

For many entrepreneurs and small businesses, ChatGPT is the first AI assistant used to code. Its strength is its versatility: explain a bug, propose a solution, generate a skeleton, help write documentation, or produce a refactor plan.

OpenAI also describes the evolution of Codex towards a “teammate” connected to tools and workflows, designed for longer development tasks.
And OpenAI highlights GPT-5 and GPT-5.2 as advances in writing code and managing complex projects.

When ChatGPT is the best AI for coding:
When you need the big picture. For example: designing an API, choosing a project structure, organizing tasks, or understanding a complex error.

The classic trap:
Copy and paste code “that looks good.” Good practice is to ask the assistant to also suggest tests, vigilance points, and a validation checklist.

Good SME fit:
Manager or team who wants a very flexible assistant, able to make the link between technique and product.
‍

Claude: very strong when analysis and long context matter

Claude is often appreciated for tasks that require reading a lot, keeping a long context, and explaining properly. Anthropic highlights its Claude models and solid capabilities on coding and agent workflows.
And Claude Code proposes “agentic coding” practices where the tool retrieves context automatically, which changes the way of working on a real project.

When Claude makes a difference:

• Code review
• Analysis of difficult bugs
• Guided refactor
• Writing clear technical documentation

Good SME fit:
Team that wants a more “reading and analysis” assistant, with a structured approach to the context.
‍

Gemini Code Assist: relevant if you are already in the Google ecosystem

Gemini Code Assist is designed to be integrated into the development cycle, with code generation, chat, inline suggestions, and various editions, including a free offering according to Google documentation.
Google also introduces Cloud Code and the integration of Gemini Code Assist into IDE plugins for VS Code and JetBrains.

When Gemini is a great fit:
If your teams are already very Google Cloud, and if you want a consistent platform for web, deployment, and coding support in the IDE.

Good SME fit:
Organization that standardizes on Google, and wants a solid assistant in the IDE with a good context.
‍

Tabnine: the “safety and control” choice above all

Tabnine explicitly talks about privacy: encryption, zero data retention, and deployment options as needed.
Its documentation also insists on the fact that Tabnine does not train on your code, and details its models and options.

When Tabnine is best:
When you have a sensitive customer, a regulated sector, or simply a strong internal requirement on security and governance.

Good SME fit:
SMEs with compliance requirements, or a team that wants to frame AI without the risk of leaks.
‍

Your next step: moving from the “AI tool” to a real gain in productivity

The best AI for coding isn't just a subscription. It's a set: a well-chosen tool, a well-managed context, code rules, a testing strategy, and a simple process that avoids bugs.

At Scroll, we help you integrate AI into your needs without losing quality: choice of tools (Copilot, Cursor, Gemini, Claude, Tabnine), security framework, implementation in the IDE, and results-oriented GitHub workflow. If you want to save time quickly, with clean and maintainable solutions, this is exactly the type of project we set up.